stxvr
02-22 12:55 AM
I have one question about signing the affidavit of support (864) for immigration of a family member.
(i.e. For petition for Immediate Relative- daughter files for mother)
If daughter signs an affidavit of support for mother (i.e. form 864) for immigrant visa (Immediate relative) then in that case for daughter is it going to create any problem in getting study loans/home loan in future?
(i.e. For petition for Immediate Relative- daughter files for mother)
If daughter signs an affidavit of support for mother (i.e. form 864) for immigrant visa (Immediate relative) then in that case for daughter is it going to create any problem in getting study loans/home loan in future?
wallpaper nate dogg funeral snoop Snoop,
k94
03-08 02:05 PM
If you are a French citizen, then yes, you can get a new H1-B visa stamp at the US Embassy in Paris. But if you are a citizen of another country, then no, you cannot get a US H1-B visa in Paris. You have the option of getting an appointment and going to a US Embassy/Consulate in Canada, Mexico, or your country of citizenship.
Whether the French will give you a French visa is another question, but regardless, you will have to have a new US H1-B visa to get back into the country.
Whether the French will give you a French visa is another question, but regardless, you will have to have a new US H1-B visa to get back into the country.
newworld
04-06 11:36 AM
WASHINGTON - Senate Republicans and Democrats closed in on a last-minute compromise Thursday on legislation opening the way to legal status and eventual citizenship for many of the 11 million immigrants living in the United States illegally.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he had been assured President Bush supports the measure, and would publicly say so later in the day.
As outlined, the measure would provide for enhanced border security, regulate the future flow of immigrants into the United States and offer legalized status to the millions of men, women and children in the country unlawfully.
"We've had a huge breakthrough" overnight, said Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
Not done deal yet
Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed, but cautioned that the agreement had not yet been sealed.
Even so, the presence of both leaders at a celebratory news conference underlined the expectation that the Senate could pass the most sweeping immigration bill in two decades, and act before leaving on a long vacation at the end of the week.
The developments marked a turnaround from Wednesday, when it appeared negotiations had faltered. The key sticking point involved the 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, and the struggle to provide them an opportunity to gain legal status without exposing lawmakers to the political charge that they were advocating amnesty for lawbreakers.
While final details were not available, in general, the compromise would require illegal immigrants who have been in the United States between two years and five years to return to their home country briefly, then re-enter as temporary workers. They could then begin a process of seeking citizenship.
Illegal immigrants here longer than five years would not be required to return home; those in the country less than two years would be required to leave without assurances of returning, and take their place in line with others seeking entry papers.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said he had been assured President Bush supports the measure, and would publicly say so later in the day.
As outlined, the measure would provide for enhanced border security, regulate the future flow of immigrants into the United States and offer legalized status to the millions of men, women and children in the country unlawfully.
"We've had a huge breakthrough" overnight, said Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn.
Not done deal yet
Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed, but cautioned that the agreement had not yet been sealed.
Even so, the presence of both leaders at a celebratory news conference underlined the expectation that the Senate could pass the most sweeping immigration bill in two decades, and act before leaving on a long vacation at the end of the week.
The developments marked a turnaround from Wednesday, when it appeared negotiations had faltered. The key sticking point involved the 11 million illegal immigrants in the country, and the struggle to provide them an opportunity to gain legal status without exposing lawmakers to the political charge that they were advocating amnesty for lawbreakers.
While final details were not available, in general, the compromise would require illegal immigrants who have been in the United States between two years and five years to return to their home country briefly, then re-enter as temporary workers. They could then begin a process of seeking citizenship.
Illegal immigrants here longer than five years would not be required to return home; those in the country less than two years would be required to leave without assurances of returning, and take their place in line with others seeking entry papers.
2011 quot;Snoop Dogg Remembers Nate
GCtension
10-21 07:53 PM
Hi All (Please respond)
I was laid off from company A in MAY 2002 (got salary till 31st May), later joined company B from 1st July 2002, so, I think, I was �out of status� for 1 month, later left company B because of differences on 31st October 2002 (received salary till 31st Oct ) and filed for H1 transfer with other company C on 11th November 2002, I got H1 approval on March 10th 2003, and started working with company C from April 2003 till now, so have 5 months gap between company B and C.
Was I out of status? If yes, looks like I was out out status for 6 months (5months continues plus 1 month earlier), unfortunately this comes to 181 days (june, nov,dec,jan,feb,march).
My I-94 was never expired and I went to India in Feb 2007 and got H1B stamping done and entered US with no problem.
I started my labor with current employer in May 2004 and got I40 approved as well, now filed for 485 in july rush, got EAD and fingerprinting notice, I am worried that my 485 may be denied because of �out of status� in past.
My Question:
1.Was I technically out of status and unlawfully present?
2.How does 180 days calculated? (continues 180 days or 180 days added in two time span like mine)?
3.If there was any out of status or unlawful present in past, Is it erased after lawful entry in US (I did enter in US this year after H1 stamping in India)?
4.Is Fingerprinting notice assures that everything is fine except security and criminal check?
Please help? I am really tensed after reading few forum, This will be horrible emotional set back for me and my family after 6 years in waiting if our 485 is rejected.
I was laid off from company A in MAY 2002 (got salary till 31st May), later joined company B from 1st July 2002, so, I think, I was �out of status� for 1 month, later left company B because of differences on 31st October 2002 (received salary till 31st Oct ) and filed for H1 transfer with other company C on 11th November 2002, I got H1 approval on March 10th 2003, and started working with company C from April 2003 till now, so have 5 months gap between company B and C.
Was I out of status? If yes, looks like I was out out status for 6 months (5months continues plus 1 month earlier), unfortunately this comes to 181 days (june, nov,dec,jan,feb,march).
My I-94 was never expired and I went to India in Feb 2007 and got H1B stamping done and entered US with no problem.
I started my labor with current employer in May 2004 and got I40 approved as well, now filed for 485 in july rush, got EAD and fingerprinting notice, I am worried that my 485 may be denied because of �out of status� in past.
My Question:
1.Was I technically out of status and unlawfully present?
2.How does 180 days calculated? (continues 180 days or 180 days added in two time span like mine)?
3.If there was any out of status or unlawful present in past, Is it erased after lawful entry in US (I did enter in US this year after H1 stamping in India)?
4.Is Fingerprinting notice assures that everything is fine except security and criminal check?
Please help? I am really tensed after reading few forum, This will be horrible emotional set back for me and my family after 6 years in waiting if our 485 is rejected.
more...
pansworld
07-15 01:48 PM
Seeing the enthusiasm of all the people on this message board, I would like to request IV Core to co-ordinate rallies in various cities by doing the following:
1. Facilitate a common date for all rallies through consensus
2. Facilitate the development of a common theme through consensus
3. Facilitate an official statement on our position on "employers that abuse the immigration system"
I propose that the San Jose rally organizers should act as advisors to other local chapters since they did a wonderful job organizing the rally.
Cheers
1. Facilitate a common date for all rallies through consensus
2. Facilitate the development of a common theme through consensus
3. Facilitate an official statement on our position on "employers that abuse the immigration system"
I propose that the San Jose rally organizers should act as advisors to other local chapters since they did a wonderful job organizing the rally.
Cheers
dunlop
09-14 07:16 PM
I've filed for the I-140 with EB-1 category in business, then additional evidence was requested and finally received a denial. I would like to know:
1. What are the chances to get approved after appealing?
2. If I were to appeal can I present new evidence?
3. After filing the appeal, how long should I expect to receive an answer from DC office?
4. If I ask for additional time before appealing, what are the chances that the additional time will be approved?
5. Is it better to appeal or to request a motion to reopen whenever I gather the new info to defend my case?
6. Do I have better chances if I skip both appealing and motion to reopen and focus on re filing a new case?
Thanks.
1. What are the chances to get approved after appealing?
2. If I were to appeal can I present new evidence?
3. After filing the appeal, how long should I expect to receive an answer from DC office?
4. If I ask for additional time before appealing, what are the chances that the additional time will be approved?
5. Is it better to appeal or to request a motion to reopen whenever I gather the new info to defend my case?
6. Do I have better chances if I skip both appealing and motion to reopen and focus on re filing a new case?
Thanks.
more...
martinvisalaw
06-29 10:38 AM
There are really 2 sub-categories of EB-3. One requires a minimum of a bachelor's degree, or equivalent in education/experience. The other requires just 2 years skilled worker experience.
The question is what your position really is, and what the employer requires. If the position really requires you to speak Korean, it can get approved. However, adding a foreign language requirement definitely invites intense scrutiny, and it can really only work if you can show that you spend a lot of your time using Korean and the company could not manage without it. You also need to show that you use Korean with people who cannot speak English, not just that they don't want to speak English. You need extensive back-up documents to prove the foreign language requirement.
The question is what your position really is, and what the employer requires. If the position really requires you to speak Korean, it can get approved. However, adding a foreign language requirement definitely invites intense scrutiny, and it can really only work if you can show that you spend a lot of your time using Korean and the company could not manage without it. You also need to show that you use Korean with people who cannot speak English, not just that they don't want to speak English. You need extensive back-up documents to prove the foreign language requirement.
2010 WATCH Nate Dogg, Snoop Dogg
gccovet
04-30 04:01 PM
Hello Gurus,
My 6 years H1B visa term is expiring on Apr 30th 2008. My company filed 3 years of extension on approved I140 basis, which is still pending as of Apr 30th 2008. And my I 94 is dated till Apr 30th 2008.
I filed my I 485 in June 2007 and got EAD and AP
1) What will be my status after Apr 30 2008. Will I still be on H1 status, if not what will be my status.
And what is 'H1 pending for 240 days rule'.
Your answer is very much appriciated.
Hydubadi.:confused:
Until you get any decision on your H1 extension, you are still considered on H1.
GCCovet
My 6 years H1B visa term is expiring on Apr 30th 2008. My company filed 3 years of extension on approved I140 basis, which is still pending as of Apr 30th 2008. And my I 94 is dated till Apr 30th 2008.
I filed my I 485 in June 2007 and got EAD and AP
1) What will be my status after Apr 30 2008. Will I still be on H1 status, if not what will be my status.
And what is 'H1 pending for 240 days rule'.
Your answer is very much appriciated.
Hydubadi.:confused:
Until you get any decision on your H1 extension, you are still considered on H1.
GCCovet
more...
nixstor
09-07 10:04 PM
3/4th of U S A sleeping :)
hair 213, Snoop Dogg, Warren G,
kumar1
10-09 09:05 AM
Unfortunately, You can not port PD in this case. Isn't it a mess!
more...
plassey
08-14 02:53 PM
Welcome, No but why do you want to know that?
Anyone here whose application was signed by BESCH?
EB2 - India
PD: Dec 2006
I-140: Feb 9, 2007
I-485: Jul 3, 2007 @ 9:04am, signed by BESCH
Checks cashed - No
Receipt - No
Anyone here whose application was signed by BESCH?
EB2 - India
PD: Dec 2006
I-140: Feb 9, 2007
I-485: Jul 3, 2007 @ 9:04am, signed by BESCH
Checks cashed - No
Receipt - No
hot To listen to the Nate Dogg
vparam
10-29 05:42 PM
There is no need to withdraw your 485. But why do you need 2 485's. It just shuts out visas for others. You can continue on H1b with your current employer and join in EAD with the other.
Not an attorney , please validate with one
Not an attorney , please validate with one
more...
house Snoop Dogg visited Mister
ilikekilo
07-23 07:24 AM
not sure where you got taht info..i believe u still can...pl contact ur lawyer...or post question on immilaw website..
tattoo Snoop Dogg Nate Dogg Funeral
pointlesswait
02-08 01:51 PM
does anyone know of any good chicago based immigration lawyer?
References are welcome!!!!
:confused:
References are welcome!!!!
:confused:
more...
pictures Nate Dogg
Prashanthi
03-26 05:49 PM
Should not be a problem, your wife can work for another company, you can work part time for another company as long as you are working for the petitioner also.
Prashanthi
Prashanthi
dresses Snoop Dogg Gets a Tattoo Of
Jaime
08-20 03:56 PM
Thanks. Send a note to KanMe about this
Thanks pappu, I just messaged him
Thanks pappu, I just messaged him
more...
makeup Snoop Dogg ft Nate Dogg – Lay
austingc
08-12 12:07 PM
Do you have I-94 attached to the approval notice?
Yes, I-94 is attached to it.
Yes, I-94 is attached to it.
girlfriend nate dogg and snoop dogg.
deardar
09-19 11:47 AM
Kudos to you and other folks who made a difference.
hairstyles Snoop Dogg. Rate It:
sadshaq12
11-06 01:13 PM
Hi!
any update on your RFE
its look like NSC is sending RFE for old PD date
mine PD is also 2001 and they ask for 2001 tax return and w2
what did you submit in your rfe response
any update on your RFE
its look like NSC is sending RFE for old PD date
mine PD is also 2001 and they ask for 2001 tax return and w2
what did you submit in your rfe response
rkumar18
09-26 07:04 PM
Hello,
I'm a Jul 2nd filer at NSC and got my receipts on Aug 12 with a notice date of Aug 8th.I'm yet to receive my FP notice.
Is anyone here in the same situation?
Thanks
I'm a Jul 2nd filer at NSC and got my receipts on Aug 12 with a notice date of Aug 8th.I'm yet to receive my FP notice.
Is anyone here in the same situation?
Thanks
factoryman
02-09 08:55 PM
Before you post new diaries, look at the links/ diaries at the left. Rule out no such threads, as you want to post are already in progess.
On this issue, one active thread is going on here at IV (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3216), the original one started by me is here (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3215).
Follow the other side here (http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/)(you can do anonymous posts). Let us stick to one thread and action.
Please don't post any further here.
On this issue, one active thread is going on here at IV (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3216), the original one started by me is here (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=3215).
Follow the other side here (http://hammondlawgroup.blogspot.com/)(you can do anonymous posts). Let us stick to one thread and action.
Please don't post any further here.
No comments:
Post a Comment